Blog / Best EPPP Prep Programs Compared (September 2026 Prices)
Best EPPP Prep Programs Compared (September 2026 Prices)
Start your free trial
7 days of full access. No credit card. Then $60/mo or $349/yr. Cancel any time.
Educational tool, not therapy. Not affiliated with ASPPB.
Short verdict: the six EPPP study programs compared here run from $60 a month to $1,799 for a one-time package. AATBS is $849 to $1,799 one-time depending on length and format ($1,099 to $1,349 for the 6-month packages); PsychPrep is $199 to $1,419 in one-time packages; Taylor Study Method is $199 to $299 a month; Academic Review is $139 a month or $599 for 6 months; PrepJet is $159 to $429 a month; thePsychology.ai is a 7-day free trial, then $60 a month or $349 a year, the lowest monthly price of the six. Every price on this page was checked on the vendor's own site on September 5, 2026. Three of those names (AATBS, Taylor Study Method, Academic Review) are one company at three price points. Pick a one-time bundle if you want a fixed calendar and print; pick a subscription if you want to pay only for the months you study; pick thePsychology.ai if you want the lowest price and an adaptive engine that recalibrates every session so those months are fewer.
If you got here from a Reddit thread where one person swears by AATBS and the next says it's overpriced, this page is the side-by-side that settles it: verified pricing, features, real user feedback, and where each program falls short, including mine.
So here's what I did: I pulled together everything (pricing, features, real user feedback, and my own experience) into one place. Six programs, side by side. No affiliate links. No sponsored content. Just a direct comparison so you can pick something and get back to studying.
For context: I'm Dr. Anders Chan. I scored 588 on the EPPP and went on to build thePsychology.ai, so yes, I have a horse in this race. I'll be upfront about that. But I'll also be upfront about where our platform falls short. You deserve honest information, not a sales pitch disguised as a review.
try thePsychology.ai free for 7 days
Want to judge the question style before starting a trial? Try the free interactive EPPP sample: answer one question per domain and see explanations without creating an account. This short sample is not a prediction of your EPPP score.
Pricing at a Glance
Before we get into features and content quality, let's start with what most people actually care about first: what this is going to cost.
| Program | Price | Model |
|---|---|---|
| AATBS | $849 to $1,799 | One-time purchase, 3 to 12 months of access ($1,099 to $1,349 for 6 months) |
| PsychPrep | $199 to $1,419 | One-time package, 1 to 9 months |
| Taylor Study Method | $199 to $299/mo | Monthly subscription |
| Academic Review | $139/mo or $599/6-mo | Monthly or prepaid |
| PrepJet | $159 to $429/mo | Monthly subscription, cheaper on 3 and 6 month plans |
| thePsychology.ai | $60/mo or $349/yr | 7-day free trial, no card, then monthly or annual |
Prices checked on each program's own site on September 5, 2026. Two of them were running promo codes that day (PrepJet 40% off Basic and Plus through September 30, Taylor Study Method 25% off sitewide), so look at the page before you buy. Promotions change, list prices change less often.
The range matters here. Most programs tier their pricing based on whether you want just the question bank, or the full package with coaching, study plans, and supplemental materials. We'll break down what you actually get at each price point below.
One thing to know before you read that table as a market: three of the six programs here (AATBS, Taylor Study Method, and Academic Review) share the same parent company. Their prices aren't three companies competing for you. They're one company offering you three price points.
Best Value: Cost Per Outcome
Here's the trap almost nobody warns you about. The cheapest sticker price is not the same as the cheapest EPPP prep. What actually matters is cost per outcome: what you pay from the day you start until the day you pass.
Monthly subscriptions look cheap on the shelf. PrepJet starts at $159/month, Taylor Study Method at $199/month, Academic Review at $139/month. But those are per month. If you study slowly, or life gets in the way, or you take a couple months longer than you planned, the meter keeps running.
Do the math. Six months of Academic Review at $139 is $834. Six months of Taylor Study Method Full at $299 is $1,794. That quietly passes AATBS, which is a flat one-time $1,099 to $1,349 for 6 months of access. So the "affordable monthly" option can end up costing more than the "expensive" one-time option. The cheapest sticker is not always the cheapest outcome.
This is why I built thePsychology.ai the way I did. It is the lowest monthly price in this comparison, and the adaptive engine is designed to make each hour count more, so you finish faster. Study less, score higher. Lower price times fewer months is the actual math of the most affordable EPPP prep, not whichever number is smallest on the pricing page. If you know you need a long runway, our annual plan is $349, which is less than three months of any other program here at list price.
If your only goal is the lowest possible spend and you already have strong foundations, a book like Mometrix ($69.99 as an ebook, $74.99 in print) is technically the cheapest thing on the market, but it is a study guide, not a course or a question engine. For most people the real question is which full program gets you to a pass for the least total cost, and that is a subscription-length problem, not a sticker-price problem.
AATBS Review
The Legacy Player
AATBS (Association for Advanced Training in the Behavioral Sciences) has been around since 1976. In EPPP prep, that's basically forever. They're the name most people hear first, usually from a supervisor or program director who used them a decade ago.
One honest aside: AATBS, Taylor Study Method, and Academic Review (both further down this list) are sister brands under the same parent company. If you're comparing them thinking they're independent second opinions, they're not. Same house, three doors.
What they do well:
- Massive question bank. Over 4,000 practice questions. If you're the type who learns by doing as many practice items as possible, AATBS gives you volume.
- Name recognition. There's a psychological comfort in going with the established option. Your program director has heard of them. Your supervisor probably used them. That social proof counts for something.
- Structured study plans. They give you a clear schedule. Open the book, do the readings, take the quizzes, move to the next chapter. If you want someone to hand you a plan and say "follow this," AATBS delivers that.
- Pass guarantee. AATBS's Pass Guaranteed packages extend your online access if you fail or need more time before the exam, terms apply. The 3-month Quick Study bundles do not include it. That's real peace of mind if you're worried about a retake.
Where they fall short:
- The materials are dry. This is the single most consistent complaint across every forum and review site. One Reddit user put it bluntly: "Reading AATBS felt like being punished for wanting to be a psychologist." Another described the study guides as "a textbook that somehow made interesting topics boring." When your study material is painful to read, you study less. And less studying means lower scores.
- Static study plans. The plan you get on day one is the plan you follow through the end. It doesn't adapt to your strengths and weaknesses. If you're already solid on biological bases but struggling with social psychology, AATBS doesn't adjust. You study everything at the same pace regardless.
- The price. At $849 for a 3-month self-study bundle up to $1,799 for 12 months of access to the live online package ($1,099 to $1,349 for the 6-month packages), AATBS is one of the most expensive options. For postdocs making $40-50K (if you're lucky), that's a real financial hit.
- The UX feels dated. The platform interface hasn't kept pace with modern learning tools. It works, but it doesn't feel good to use. When you're spending 200+ hours on a platform, the user experience matters more than people think.
Bottom line: AATBS is the safe, established choice. If you want a large question bank, a traditional study structure, and a pass guarantee, and price isn't your primary concern, it gets the job done. Plenty of people pass with AATBS. But you're paying a premium for a product that hasn't evolved much. We break the two down head to head in thePsychology.ai vs AATBS.
PsychPrep Review
Strong on Questions, Divisive on Style
PsychPrep positions itself as a more modern alternative to AATBS, with a focus on practice questions and detailed explanations.
What they do well:
- Detailed explanations. Each practice question comes with a rationale that breaks down why the correct answer is correct and why the distractors are wrong. If you learn well from immediate feedback, this is genuinely useful.
- Clean interface. Compared to AATBS, the platform looks and feels more modern. It's a better studying experience from a pure usability standpoint.
Where they fall short:
- Question style concerns. This is where PsychPrep gets polarizing. Multiple users have reported that the questions feel "designed to trick you" rather than matching the actual wording and style of EPPP items. One user on a psychology forum wrote: "PsychPrep questions made me second-guess everything. Then I sat for the actual exam and realized the real questions were way more straightforward." If practice questions train you to overthink, they're doing more harm than good.
- Fixed question bank. The questions you get are the questions you get. There's no way to generate new items, so if you work through the bank, you start seeing repeats. That's a problem because recognition memory and actual knowledge are different things, and you might "remember" the right answer without truly understanding the concept.
- No pass guarantee. PsychPrep's pricing page lists renewal fees ($129 to $199 depending on the package) rather than a pass guarantee. If you fail, there's no built-in extension the way AATBS or the Taylor Full program offer.
- Pricing. At $199 for the Basic 1-month package up to $1,419 for the 9-month Premium, PsychPrep spans a wide range. The lower tier gives you limited access and time, and the full package edges past AATBS territory.
Bottom line: PsychPrep is a solid option if you're someone who learns through high-volume practice and detailed feedback. But the question-style issue is worth paying attention to. If their questions train you to expect tricks that aren't on the real exam, your practice scores won't translate to test day. For a direct comparison, see thePsychology.ai vs PsychPrep.
Taylor Study Method Review
Monthly Model, Mixed Results
Taylor Study Method takes a different approach with monthly subscription pricing and a focus on coaching and mentorship. Worth knowing up front: Taylor Study Method shares a parent company with AATBS and Academic Review, so it isn't an independent alternative to either.
What they do well:
- Monthly pricing. At $199/month (Exams Only) up to $299/month (Full Program), you're not committing a lump sum upfront. If you pass quickly, you spend less overall. This is genuinely helpful for people who can't float a $1,000+ charge.
- Coaching component. Coaching is included on the Full Program, which can be valuable for accountability and targeted guidance.
- Pass guarantee (Full only). The Full Program carries a pass guarantee: complete the full curriculum and don't pass, and they extend your access free, terms apply. Read those terms carefully before you count on it.
Where they fall short:
- Content accuracy concerns. This one is serious. Multiple users have reported finding inaccurate content in the study materials. When you're preparing for a licensing exam, content errors don't just waste your time. They actively teach you wrong information. One user noted: "I cross-referenced some of their material with my grad school textbooks and found several errors. That shook my confidence in the whole program."
- Coaching reliability. Several reviews mention coaches canceling appointments or being difficult to schedule with. If coaching is a main selling point and the coaching isn't reliable, the value proposition breaks down.
- Cost adds up over time. Because it's monthly, a slow study timeline gets expensive fast. At $299/month, six months is nearly $1,800, which quietly passes AATBS's one-time price. See the cost-per-outcome section above.
- Overall reviews. Compared to other options, Taylor Study Method has a noticeably higher rate of negative reviews. That pattern is hard to ignore.
Bottom line: The monthly pricing model is appealing, and if you get a good coach, the personalized support can help. But the reports of content inaccuracies and inconsistent coaching are red flags. If you go this route, cross-reference everything with established textbooks.
Academic Review Review
Affordable and Assessment-Based
Academic Review offers a subscription entry point with a study approach that starts with a diagnostic assessment. Worth knowing up front: Academic Review is a sister brand of both AATBS and Taylor Study Method, sharing the same parent company. Same house, different door.
What they do well:
- Reasonable price point. At $139/month, or $599 prepaid for 6 months, Academic Review is one of the more budget-friendly subscription options. For postdocs watching every dollar, this matters.
- Initial assessment. They start with a diagnostic that identifies your strengths and weaknesses, then build a study plan around the results. In principle, this is the right idea: study what you don't know, not what you already do.
- Pass guarantee (6-month prepaid only). The $599 prepaid 6-month plan carries a pass guarantee. The month-to-month plan does not.
Where they fall short:
- "Adaptive" is a stretch. The initial assessment is useful, but the personalization mostly ends there. You take one assessment, you get one plan. It doesn't continuously adapt as you learn. True adaptive learning means the system is constantly recalibrating based on your performance. Academic Review's approach is more like a placement test followed by a static curriculum.
- Limited content depth. Users have noted that the study materials, while organized, don't go deep enough on certain content areas. If you're weak in a specific domain, you might need to supplement with other resources.
Bottom line: Academic Review is a reasonable choice if budget is your top priority and you want some level of personalized guidance. Just know that the personalization is front-loaded, the system won't keep adjusting as you progress, and the guarantee only applies to the prepaid plan.
PrepJet Review
Subscription-Based with Targeted Drilling
PrepJet (prepjet.net) is a newer entrant with a monthly subscription model. Plans run $159/$269/$429 per month (Basic/Plus/Premium), dropping to $139/$179/$279 a month on a 3-month plan and $109/$139/$209 a month on a 6-month plan. There is a free trial with no credit card. That puts it above Academic Review and on par with the Taylor Study Method range.
What they do well:
- No large upfront cost. The month-to-month subscription means you're not locked into a $1,000+ purchase. You can cancel when you pass, which limits your exposure if you study efficiently.
- Sub-domain drill-down. The platform lets you target specific content areas within each domain, which is useful for zeroing in on your weakest topics rather than reviewing entire domains.
- Readiness score. PrepJet provides a readiness assessment that attempts to detect your deficiencies and guide your studying. Users can also mark and highlight questions for later review and message exam experts with questions.
- Free trial, no card. You can take the diagnostic exam inside the trial and see your Readiness Score before you pay anything. PrepJet does not advertise a pass guarantee.
Where they fall short:
- Pricing is on the higher end. PrepJet runs $159 to $429/month depending on the plan, more expensive than Academic Review and in the Taylor Study Method range. For a product that markets itself as an affordable option, the upper tiers can add up quickly, especially across a multi-month study window.
- Question quality concerns. Some users have described the questions as "awkward and purposefully ambiguous," with practice scores in the 40s-50s after a month of studying. Ambiguous questions can train you to second-guess yourself in ways that don't match the actual EPPP format.
- Audio materials are limited. PrepJet offers audio study materials, but user feedback describes them as "pretty monotone." If audio is a key part of your study strategy, the quality may not hold your attention.
- Very few independent reviews. Compared to AATBS, PsychPrep, or even Taylor Study Method, PrepJet has a noticeably smaller footprint of online reviews and user discussions. That makes it harder to get a reliable read on the experience before committing.
Bottom line: PrepJet may work for candidates who want a subscription-based option with sub-domain targeting. The readiness score is a useful feature. But at $159 to $429/month, it's not the bargain it positions itself as, and the limited reviews and concerns about question quality make it harder to recommend with confidence. Pay attention to whether their question style matches the real exam before committing. Full breakdown in thePsychology.ai vs PrepJet.
thePsychology.ai Review
Full Disclosure: This Is Our Platform
I built thePsychology.ai, so I'm going to be extra transparent here. I'll tell you what we do well, what we don't do well yet, and who we're actually a good fit for.
What we do well:
- Price. You can start for free with a 7-day trial, no credit card required (a .edu email can earn a free month by inviting classmates). After the trial, it's $60 a month or $349 a year, the lowest monthly price of any program in this comparison, and the rate you join at is the rate you keep. There is one plan, and it includes everything.
- AI-adaptive learning loop. This is the core of what makes us different. The platform continuously adapts to your performance. Miss a question on classical conditioning? The system notes that, adjusts your study plan, and resurfaces that concept with different question angles until you've actually learned it, not just memorized one specific question. Every session recalibrates.
- Application-based questions, not flashcards. Our questions are built like the real exam: clinical vignettes that ask "what is the most appropriate next step," not definition-and-recall trivia. You practice thinking like a psychologist, which is what the EPPP actually tests. You can try a set of our free EPPP practice questions or browse EPPP practice questions by domain to see the style.
- 80+ short lessons. Content is organized by EPPP content domain, written by psychologists, and designed to be high-yield. We focus on what actually shows up on the exam rather than trying to cover every edge case in a 900-page textbook. Backed by 3,000+ questions, 20 full-length practice exams, and 24/7 AI help that explains any question you miss.
- Built by psychologists who took the exam. I scored 588 on the EPPP. Our content team includes licensed psychologists who've been through this process. We know what the exam feels like, and we built the platform around that experience. This isn't an EdTech company that decided psychology licensing was a market opportunity. It started from the actual problem.
- Built-in wellness features. This is something no other EPPP prep program offers, and I think that's a blind spot in the industry. EPPP prep is stressful. Anxiety tanks performance. We built anxiety resets and recovery tools directly into the study experience, not as an afterthought or a separate app, but integrated into the flow. You're studying to become a psychologist; your prep tool should reflect that.
- Modern UX. The platform is designed for how people actually study in 2026: clean interface, responsive design, distraction-free environment.
Where we fall short (honestly):
- We're newer. thePsychology.ai doesn't have decades of track record. AATBS has been around since 1976. We launched recently. That means our user base is smaller, and we have fewer testimonials and long-term data points. If a long track record is important to you, that's a legitimate concern.
- Smaller user community. With fewer users, there's less peer discussion and community activity compared to platforms that have been around longer. We're growing, but we're not there yet.
- No Android app yet. There is a native iPhone app with synced progress, but Android users get the mobile-responsive web app (it works well in mobile browsers), not a native app. If you're on Android and specifically want an app, that's a limitation today.
Bottom line: thePsychology.ai is built for people who want adaptive, efficient studying at a price that doesn't hurt. Free trial, then $60 a month or $349 a year, the lowest monthly price in this comparison. But if you want a program with a 20-year track record, we're not there yet. There is a native iPhone app; Android is mobile web for now. I'd rather you know that upfront than find out after you've committed.
Feature Comparison Matrix
Here's how all six programs stack up across the features that matter most:
| Feature | AATBS | PsychPrep | Taylor Study | Academic Review | PrepJet | thePsychology.ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $849 (one-time, 3 months) | $199 (one-time, 1 month) | $199/mo | $139/mo | $159/mo | $60/mo or $349/yr |
| Question Bank | 4,000 | Not stated on its pricing page | 3,800+ | 2,200 | 1,500+ | 3,000+ |
| Adaptive Learning | No | No | No | Basic (one-time assessment) | Basic (readiness score) | Yes (continuous) |
| Content Quality | Dense but thorough | Good with detailed rationales | Mixed accuracy reports | Adequate | Mixed reviews on question clarity | High-yield, psychologist-written |
| Question Style | Recall + application | Detailed rationales | Mixed | Assessment-driven | Reported ambiguous | Application (clinical vignettes) |
| Mobile App | No | No | No | No | No | iPhone app (Android: mobile web) |
| Wellness Features | No | No | No | No | No | Yes (integrated) |
| Pass Guarantee | Yes (not on 3-month bundles) | Not advertised | Full plan only | 6-mo prepaid only | Not advertised | Yes (billing pause up to 6 months) |
| Coaching Available | Yes (included on Live Online, add-on on Self-Study) | Email expert feedback | Yes (Full Program) | No | Listed on all tiers, plus free workshops | No human coaching (24/7 AI help) |
| Exam Simulation | Yes (8 full-length) | Yes | Yes (unlimited) | Yes (unlimited) | Yes | Yes (20 full-length) |
| Study Plan | Static | Static | Coach-directed | Assessment-based (static) | Readiness-based | AI-adaptive (dynamic) |
A few things jump out from this matrix. First, thePsychology.ai has a native iPhone app; none of the other five mention a native app on the pages we checked, and Android is mobile web everywhere. Second, adaptive learning (the kind that actually adjusts continuously) is still rare. Most programs give you a fixed path and call it personalized. Third, wellness features are essentially nonexistent outside of thePsychology.ai. For a field built on understanding human behavior and mental health, that's ironic.
If you're weighing us against a study guide book rather than a full course, see thePsychology.ai vs Mometrix.
Which Program Is Right for You?
If you are choosing EPPP study materials, start with the part of studying you need help completing. Sample a lesson, answer unfamiliar questions, and check whether you can explain your mistakes afterward. Compare access length and the total cost for your likely study window alongside the headline price.
Already bought a program? Read when to switch EPPP prep programs before paying for another one. It walks through keeping your current course, adding a targeted resource, or replacing the main program.
Comparing sample results and outcome claims? Read why practice scores differ between programs and how to evaluate a pass-rate claim. Neither a more comfortable quiz score nor a larger headline percentage settles which resource fits your study needs.
There's no single best EPPP prep program. There's the best one for your situation. Here's how I'd break it down:
If budget is your primary concern: Start with thePsychology.ai. Free trial, no credit card, then $60 a month or $349 a year, the lowest monthly price in this comparison. Academic Review is next at $139/month (or $599 prepaid for 6 months); PrepJet starts at $159/month. Remember the cost-per-outcome math: a low monthly price only stays cheap if you finish in a reasonable number of months.
If you want traditional, structured studying: AATBS is the established choice. You get a textbook-style experience with a large question bank, a clear schedule, and a pass guarantee. It's not exciting, but it's predictable. Some people study best with that kind of structure.
If you want a human coach: AATBS includes 8 live online coaching sessions in its Live Online Pass Guaranteed packages and sells coaching as an add-on to Self-Study. Taylor Study Method includes a coaching session on the Full Program, though user reviews on coaching reliability have been mixed. PrepJet runs free coaching workshops. thePsychology.ai does not offer human coaching; you get 24/7 AI help instead.
If you need maximum practice question volume: AATBS (4,000 questions) and Taylor Study Method (3,800+) list the largest fixed question banks, and PsychPrep's detailed rationales are the reason people pick it. thePsychology.ai has 3,000+ questions across all domains plus 20 full-length practice exams.
If test anxiety is a factor: thePsychology.ai is the only program with built-in wellness and mindfulness tools. If anxiety has historically affected your test performance, integrated support matters more than most people realize. You can always use a separate mindfulness app alongside another program, but the integration makes a difference.
If you've already failed the EPPP and need to retake: An adaptive program that identifies and targets your specific weak areas is probably more useful than re-reading the same static material. thePsychology.ai's adaptive loop or Academic Review's diagnostic assessment are both designed to pinpoint gaps. Repeating the exact same study approach that didn't work the first time usually doesn't produce different results. We wrote a full playbook on what to do after failing the EPPP.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AATBS worth it?
AATBS is worth it if you want a large question bank (4,000 items), a traditional structured study plan, a pass guarantee, and the comfort of a brand that's been around since 1976, and the $849 to $1,799 one-time price fits your budget. Its flat one-time cost can actually beat monthly subscriptions if your study timeline runs long. Where it loses value is on user experience (the materials read as dry) and on personalization (the plan is static and doesn't adapt to your weak domains). If you want adaptive, application-based studying at a lower monthly cost, compare it against us in thePsychology.ai vs AATBS.
What is the cheapest EPPP prep?
The cheapest single product is a study guide book like Mometrix ($69.99 ebook, $74.99 print), but that's a book, not a course or a question engine. Among full prep programs, thePsychology.ai is the most affordable EPPP prep at $60 a month or $349 a year, with a free trial and the lowest monthly price of any program here. Just remember that with any monthly plan, total cost equals price times the number of months you study, so the cheapest sticker isn't always the cheapest outcome. See the cost-per-outcome section above for the math.
What is the best EPPP prep app for 2026?
For 2026, the strongest option for adaptive, application-based prep is thePsychology.ai: it uses a continuous adaptive engine that finds and drills your weakest domains, application-style clinical vignettes instead of recall flashcards, 20 full-length practice exams, and integrated anxiety resets, all at $60 a month or $349 a year. It also has a native iPhone app with synced progress; Android users get the mobile-responsive web app.
What is the pass rate for the EPPP?
National first-time pass rates vary by year, so we don't quote a single hard number here. For the authoritative, up-to-date figure and how it breaks down by degree type, see our EPPP pass rates data breakdown. One thing to keep in mind across every program: no EPPP prep company publishes independently verified pass rates for their users, so treat any pass-rate claim a prep company makes about its own users with healthy skepticism.
How long should I study for the EPPP?
Most people who pass spend 3-6 months studying, averaging 10-15 hours per week. But the right timeline depends on how recently you graduated, how strong your foundational knowledge is, and how many hours per week you can realistically commit. The key word is realistically. Planning 25 hours per week of studying while working a full-time postdoc is a plan that fails by week two. Study less, score higher. That's not a slogan, it's about efficiency. Focused, high-yield studying beats grinding through material you already know.
Is the EPPP changing in 2026?
Here's the current, correct picture. Today you take EPPP Part 1, the Knowledge exam (225 items, 175 scored plus 50 unscored pretest, 8 content domains, scaled score 200-800, with ASPPB's recommended passing score of 500 for independent practice). EPPP Part 2, the Skills exam, still exists and is required only if your specific state or provincial board requires it, since not all boards do. What ASPPB paused in October 2024 was the mandate that every jurisdiction adopt both parts, not Part 2 itself. Separately, ASPPB is developing a single integrated EPPP (6 competency domains, mixing multiple-choice, scenario clusters, audio and video stimuli, and situational judgment, scored pass or fail): it goes live in Q4 2027 and becomes the only exam on April 1, 2028. For the full timeline and what it means for you, read EPPP vs EPPP-2. Always confirm requirements with your own licensing board.
Guarantees Compared (Added August 2026)
Several programs in this comparison advertise pass guarantees, and they are not the same product. The four questions that matter: what's the remedy, how long does it last, what must you do to qualify, and how much are you in for before it protects you? AATBS's published remedy is an access extension on a four-figure package. Academic Review's attaches to the prepaid tier. PrepJet doesn't advertise one (their free trial is the risk-removal). Ours: meet the study criteria and don't pass, and we pause your billing free until your next attempt, up to six months, on a $60 a month plan. Separately, if the EPPP format changes before you pass, integrated-exam prep is included at no extra cost while your subscription stays active (we call that the Format-Proof Guarantee). The full fine-print reading of every guarantee, including ours, is in EPPP Pass Guarantees Compared, and our complete terms are at thepsychology.ai/guarantee.
Final Thoughts
Here's what I wish someone had told me when I was in your position: the program you choose matters less than whether you actually use it consistently. The best prep program is the one you'll stick with. A $1,349 program you abandon after three weeks loses to a free program you use every day.
That said, not all study hours are equal. Adaptive learning, where the system focuses your time on what you don't know instead of what you already do, makes each hour count more. That's the principle thePsychology.ai was built on.
If you're ready to start, you can try thePsychology.ai free for 7 days, no credit card required. And if you decide another program is a better fit for you, that's fine too. The goal is the same either way: pass the EPPP, get licensed, and start doing the work you trained for.
Study less, score higher. That's the whole idea.
Sources
Prices and features checked on September 5, 2026.
- AATBS EPPP study packages: https://www.aatbs.com/psychology/eppp/study-packages
- AATBS self-study package prices: https://www.aatbs.com/psychology/eppp/select-self-study-packages
- AATBS live online package prices: https://www.aatbs.com/psychology/eppp/select-live-online-packages
- PsychPrep packages and pricing: https://www.psychprep.com/packages-and-pricing
- PrepJet: https://www.prepjet.net/
- Taylor Study Method EPPP exam prep: https://www.taylorstudymethod.com/eppp-exam-prep
- Academic Review EPPP exam prep programs: https://www.academicreview.com/psychology/eppp-exam-prep-programs
- Mometrix EPPP study guide: https://www.mometrix.com/studyguides/eppp/
- thePsychology.ai pricing: https://www.thepsychology.ai/pricing
- thePsychology.ai pass guarantee terms: https://www.thepsychology.ai/guarantee
- ASPPB 2027 EPPP content specifications: https://asppb.net/insights-advocacy/asppb-announces-2027-eppp-content-specifications/
- ASPPB eligibility and cost update: https://asppb.net/news/eppp-eligibility-updates-professional-practice-cost/
- ASPPB EPPP Candidate Handbook (domain weights, passing score, fees, retakes): https://asppb.net/wp-content/uploads/EPPP-Candidate-Handbook.pdf

Anders Chan, Psy.D. is a licensed psychologist and the founder of thePsychology.ai. He passed the EPPP on his first attempt with a score of 588 after starting from a 19% diagnostic.
